Skip to content
LAT37.8044° NLON122.2711° WX-13611157 mY4551831 mE564166 mN4184363 mE6050014 ftN2120204 ftBRG041.0°041.0°040.6°042.1°ZOOM11.0CRS

Where site selection decisions get made

Screen candidates and score the shortlist, then put the live map in front of the people making the call. They open a link, not a PDF.

felt.com/map/parcels-and-properties-by-age

You’ve heard all three in a siting meeting

  • Who has the latest flood layer?

    Every layer lives somewhere different: parcels with a vendor, demographics with the Census, flood zones with FEMA. Someone spends weeks collecting them before a single site gets screened.

    Site analyst
  • Is this the current version?

    The people making the call don’t open GIS. They see the analysis as PDFs and slides, so every question means another export, and the map on screen is already out of date.

    Committee chair
  • That’s not how we scored it.

    Real estate scores on demographics, engineering on constraints, finance on cost, each in its own spreadsheet. The same site comes back with three different answers.

    Engineering lead

How site selection works in Felt

Uploaded files, a live database, and an Internet Data Finder search all feeding one stack of map layers: parcels, the creek and its floodplain, and a transmission line.

Assemble

Every layer on one map. Files, live databases, Esri Feature Services. Ask the Data Finder for what’s missing: "transmission lines in Bexar County" arrives styled and sourced in seconds.

An aerial map of ranch parcels with the transmission corridor buffered, the creek’s floodplain and wetland hatched out, and small parcels greyed, leaving five candidate sites outlined in orange beside an AI prompt with its filters.

Screen

Fatal flaws first. Buffer transmission corridors, exclude wetlands and floodplains, filter by acreage and ownership. Felt AI runs it from plain English, so screening doesn’t wait on GIS bandwidth.

A desktop map with the surviving parcels shaded by score, the top site selected with its criteria scores beside it, and three finalists compared side by side below.

Score and compare

Join your internal data to the survivors and rank them on weighted criteria. Style the scores so the shortlist reads at a glance. Compare finalists side by side.

A ranch gate on the north edge of a site and, on a laptop map of the same site, a comment pinned to that gate with two replies, among other reviewers' pins across the parcel.

Decide

Share the map with a link. No license, no install, no training. "What about access from the north?" gets asked as a comment pinned to the parcel. The committee meets inside the map.

Map your first candidate sites →

Retail site selection

Felt brings demographics, foot traffic, competitors and your own store performance onto one map, so you can draw drive-time trade areas around every candidate and compare the finalists side by side.

The data
  • Demographics and income
  • Foot traffic and mobility
  • Drive-time trade areas
  • Competitors and co-tenants
  • Existing store performance
  • Available properties

Solar & renewable siting

Felt puts parcels, transmission, terrain and environmental constraints on one map, and Felt AI screens them in plain English: buffer the lines, rule out wetlands and floodplains, and work out the buildable acres on each parcel. Land agents run that themselves instead of waiting on the GIS team.

The data
  • Parcels and ownership
  • Transmission and substations
  • Slope and aspect
  • Wetlands, flood zones and protected lands
  • Interconnection queues
  • Land contacts and outreach status

Data center site selection

Data center sites start with power. Felt layers substation capacity and interconnection queues with fiber, water, zoning and environmental risk, so you screen on power first and weigh the rest on the same map.

The data
  • Substations and transmission capacity
  • Interconnection queue positions
  • Fiber routes and carrier hotels
  • Parcels and zoning
  • Water availability and rights
  • Flood, seismic, environmental constraints
  • Competing announced projects

Your data gets in without a fight

Every siting team asks the same question next: how does our data get in?

Bring it

Upload Anything. Shapefiles, GeoJSON, KML, geodatabases, GeoTIFF, DWG/DXF, spreadsheets, and most anything else GDAL reads.

Add by URL. Paste a link to a Google Sheet, an Airtable view, a hosted file, or an ArcGIS service, and turn on Live to keep it refreshing.

Find it

Global Library. Census demographics, boundaries, flood and drought risk, roads, and power plants: curated public data, sourced and dated, on every plan.

Internet Data Finder. Locates public datasets by plain-English request and adds them styled and sourced.

Connect it

Live connections. Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, SQL Server, and Esri Feature Services keep internal data current on the map.

Work it

Felt AI. Runs spatial analysis conversationally: buffers, filters, joins, summaries.

API + Felt MCP server. For teams wiring siting into automated or agent-driven workflows.

Try Felt

Put your next site decision on a map

Free to start. Your committee never needs a license.